Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 16:28:15 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc: Zoey4Pres <zoey4pres AT aol DOT com>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com,
        Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Subject: Re: NULL redefined in djgpp headers
In-Reply-To: <m0ymH9K-000S3nC@inti.gov.ar>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980617162616.20468A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:

> 3) Why a correction? the fault is in the djgpp headers, we must check before 
> defining NULL, or not?

I think it should be corrected.  Telling users to edit their system 
headers is IMHO a bad idea.  It doesn't matter to me where's the 
correction as long as the problem is solved.  Since DJ objects to 
changing the headers in %DJDIR%/include, let's change the C++ headers.