From: George Foot Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: What files do I Really need? Date: 14 Jun 1998 08:18:48 GMT Organization: Oxford University, England Lines: 30 Message-ID: <6m0118$469$3@news.ox.ac.uk> References: <357AB511 DOT B08B7341 AT zetnet DOT co DOT uk> <357AF255 DOT 6EBA4D1D AT cs DOT com> <6lgjt8$78m$3 AT trog DOT dra DOT hmg DOT gb> <357C65F5 DOT 22D9D6E6 AT cs DOT com> <6ljsoq$j2p$1 AT trog DOT dra DOT hmg DOT gb> <357DBC51 DOT ED5B17F6 AT cs DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sable.ox.ac.uk To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk On Tue, 09 Jun 1998 18:50:57 -0400 in comp.os.msdos.djgpp John M. Aldrich wrote: : Walter Gray wrote: : > I am in favour of anything that is super-pared-down. I still use MS : > quick-C and turbo-C version 1.5. As for "helping design", my main : > contribution would be to fetch the pizza and say "more comments". : What you could do is help figure out which files really are absolutely : necessary by trying out various combinations on your system. Figure out : what you, a novice user, seem to need or not need. I did this some time ago, but I think at the time people had mixed feelings about whether or not providing this would be a good thing to do. I got it down below 5Mb, fitting on two floppies when zipped, including everything needed for C compilation, libc docs, FAQ (text), binaries for Make and Info, and perhaps some other things that I've forgotten at the moment. For C++ compilation, it was just necessary to drop in the C++ packages at the time; that was gcc-2.7.2.1 though. The trouble is that in a cut-down distribution like this some components are missing and people might come to this newsgroup to complain about this, without reading the readme (which would say where they can get the full packages, of course). -- george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk xu do tavla fo la lojban -- http://xiron.pc.helsinki.fi/lojban/lojban.html