Message-Id: <m0yUynK-000S41C@inti.gov.ar>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
To: Peter Steele <p DOT steele AT ic DOT ac DOT uk>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 16:22:16 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: DFE
In-reply-to: <35489193.7E85669@ic.ac.uk>
Precedence: bulk

Peter Steele <p DOT steele AT ic DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:

> I have just recently downloaded DFe an IDE for DJGPP which works in
> win95, anyone used it much, I am not sure whethere this is better than
> RHIDE or not.

Just try RHIDE and see that's all. Here is my biased opinion:

RHIDE have debugger and an .info viewer incorporated. The editor of RHIDE is 
much more flexible. RHIDE supports relative complex projects (with nested 
subprojects).

Disadvantage of RHIDE (Isn't a disadvantage for me, but for other users): Isn't 
a native Windows application.
I can't see why that's a disadvantage, but that what some people says. I think 
that's the main reason of DFE.

Don't forget Emacs (I think there are ports for Windows too).

SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013