From: mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl (Ruiter de M)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: need help with LFN please...
Date: 8 Apr 1998 13:58:40 GMT
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <6gfvqg$gq6$1@star.cs.vu.nl>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980405153404 DOT 5976K-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sloep109.cs.vu.nl
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il) wrote:
> LFN is virtually untested without Windows 95.  I'm also told the LFN
> TSR of NDOS is slow and buggy.

I'm sure you mean DR-DOS or OpenDOS here. NDOS/4DOS are just
command.com replacements and have nothing to do with LFNs directly.

-- 
Groeten, Michel.        http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mdruiter
 \----/==\----/
  \  /    \  /          "You know, Beavis, you need things that suck,
   \/      \/           to have things that are cool", Butt-Head.