Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 10:41:21 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803281841.KAA16614@adit.ap.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Shawn Hargreaves , djgpp AT delorie DOT com From: Nate Eldredge Subject: Re: transparent Color Precedence: bulk At 12:40 3/23/1998 +0000, Shawn Hargreaves wrote: >Jason Dagit writes: >>Could you define "bright pink" a little bit (no pun intended) better? > >I don't want to go into too verbose an explanation, because there are >many different functions that use masked drawing modes and I'd rather >not have a huge mass of text explaining each one. Do you think people >would understand better if I called it magenta instead of pink? Strictly >speaking the secondary colors are yellow, cyan, and magenta, so it isn't >100% correct to call it pink at all, but I thought (foolishly? :-) that >more people would understand pink than magenta... Perhaps you ought to explain that it's (max blue, max red, 0 green)? Nate Eldredge eldredge AT ap DOT net