From: Bjorn De Meyer <bgdmeyer AT eduserv2 DOT rug DOT ac DOT be>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Which is better? RHIDE or EMACS?
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:36:24 +0100
Organization: University of Ghent, Belgium
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980313133422.26931A-100000@eduserv2.rug.ac.be>
References: <6ea0ol$5n2 AT kukini DOT k12 DOT hi DOT us>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eduserv2.rug.ac.be
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <6ea0ol$5n2@kukini.k12.hi.us>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On 13 Mar 1998, Eric Nakagawa wrote:

> Hi just another question...which is better...RHIDE or EMACs...
> oh and is ALLEGRO 3.0 worth getting if I want to make a graphical program?
> Well thanks in advance hehehe
> 
> 				Eric Nakagawa
> 				Aloha from Hawaii
> 
<snip sig>
RHIDE is the most user-friendly I think, and yes, Allegro 3.0 is EXELLENT
for graphical applications!

(ps: Your signature is a little too long, I think.)

Bjorn De Meyer.
Homepage: http//studwww.rug.ac.be/~bgdmeyer
E-mail: bjorn DOT demeyer AT rug DOT ac DOT be 
Chemistry student at RUG, option polymers.
Coordinator of the "Tales of Artah: First Sword" CRPG project.         
         
                Beyond everything, there is nothing...