From: James Undery <james AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: [Q]Computing speed in C++
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:54:24 +0000
Organization: None unless you want to pay me
Message-ID: <HsXv8FAwJp$0Ewie@ghoti.demon.co.uk>
References: <34FCB769 DOT 42BEF1A8 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>
 <34FD3174 DOT 2401F904 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr> <NhY3fDAorU$0Ewz4 AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
 <34FD593A DOT DF2207FA AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>
Reply-To: ghoti AT nospam DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: ghoti.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 12
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <34FD593A DOT DF2207FA AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>, Bum-Seok Hyun
<dominic AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr> writes
>> That said the C++ is still slower 22s (25s using your code) compared to
>> 16s (on my system).
>
>Excuse me, sir.Exactly what did mean using my code and yours?
>

my version was to compile the c as c++, instead of using your c++
version.
-- 
James Undery <james AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>