From: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Portability section for libc docs
Date: 15 Feb 1998 12:18:07 GMT
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <6c6mdv$h97@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980215131448 DOT 27889E-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet5.carleton.ca
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk


>IMHO, this doesn't belong to the libc docs.  The library reference is
>a document which describes the library.  It shouldn't describe things
>which are NOT in the library.  It is even impossible to do so, since
>the libc docs are arranged by the function names.

I didn't specify the libc docs, I meant simply the DJGPP docs.

>I do agree that it would be nice to have such an addition, but it
>should go into the DJGPP Knowledge Base (info/kb.inf), not into the
>libc docs.  I think it should be a part of a tutorial about porting
>software to DJGPP (any takers?).

Good plan...

--
    .*.  Friendship, companionship, love, and having fun are the reasons for
 -()  <  life. All else; sex, money, fame, etc.; are just to get/express these.
    `*'  Send any and all mail with attachments to the hotmail address please.
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca pgd73 AT hotmail DOT com