From: "Rob Zombie" <digifx AT concentric DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Frames per second question
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 20:57:01 -0500
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <6aonmm$rq5@examiner.concentric.net>
References: <6ae2u5$ls2$1 AT herald DOT Mines DOT EDU> <6aeqlq$qjq$2 AT news DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <6am4g7$dtk$1 AT herald DOT Mines DOT EDU> <6amsdf$aap$1 AT news DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts010d01.sag-mi.concentric.net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

>I don't think `efficient' is really the right term to use for a delay
>loop ;).  You might consider calling __dpmi_yield in the loop, which
>would let background tasks the OS is performing continue, but this is
>probably undesirable in a game.

Syntax

void delay(unsigned msec);
Description
This function causes the program to pause for msec milliseconds.  It uses
the `int 15h' delay function to relinquish the CPU to other programs that
might need it.
Return Value
None.
Example

delay(200); /* delay for 1/5 second */