From: jah AT rrnet DOT com (Hjelmo)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: SoftICE question
Date: 27 Jan 1998 00:20:48 GMT
Organization: atomly :: [pHiXx|VorteX/rC/nothing]
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <6aj990$e49$2@news.rrnet.com>
References: <34cbfa84 DOT 6165891 AT news DOT pacific DOT net DOT sg> <34CC74BF DOT 1936320 AT usa DOT net>
Reply-To: phixx@@usa..net
NNTP-Posting-Host: rrnet.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

: I'd use the DOS version if I were you, because NT is secure to the point
: of being unusable.
: Soft-Ice for NT sounds like softice with most of its guts removed.

I'd have to disagree with the DOS recommendation.  The DOS version of
SoftICE that I have, which is admittedly old, will not debug protected
mode applications; this is definitely a bad thing :) 

It is quite possible that SoftICE/DOS will now debug protected mode
applications, but I'm not sure.

--
    atomly@@mindless..com :: [pHiXx/VorteX] :: phixx@@usa..net
.  . ..remove the extraneous punctuation in my addresses.. .  .   .