From: "John M. Aldrich" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: LFNs work except with dos_findfirst/next Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 22:54:29 -0500 Organization: Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt. Lines: 18 Message-ID: <34B84275.33F3@cs.com> References: <698smk$ppc AT camel19 DOT mindspring DOT com> Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp232.cs.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Sam Barjoud wrote: > > _USE_LFN reports 1, and fopen()/fwrite() can access and create files > with lfns....but dos_findfirst and dos_findnext return truncated > filenames. Not sure if this is the problem, but here's the way in > which I invoke dos_findfirst: I examined the source, and _dos_findfirst()/_dos_findnext() do not appear to support long filenames. Is there any reason why you can't use findfirst()/findnext() instead? They do support LFNs. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | John M. Aldrich | "Sin lies only in hurting other | | aka Fighteer I | people unnecessarily. All other | | mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com | 'sins' are invented nonsense." | | http://www.cs.com/fighteer | - Lazarus Long | ---------------------------------------------------------------------