Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 16:03:43 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Peter Palotas <blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: rand() or random()
In-Reply-To: <3.0.16.19971113144224.27df5548@hem1.passagen.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971113155946.24262B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, Peter Palotas wrote:

> Uhm... Excuse me, but does this mean that if I use random() in my programs
> the binaries must display "This product includes software developed 
> by.... "??

Did I say I was no lawyer?

However, observe this:

> > * [...] (2) distributions including binaries display 
> > * the following acknowledgement [...]
> > * in the documentation or other materials provided with the distribution
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So it's not the binaries that must display the acknowledgement, it's the 
docs and the ads *included* in the binary distribuition.