From: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Degugging large projects under RHIDE
Date: 10 Nov 1997 05:51:29 GMT
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <6467d1$dug@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 971107114536 DOT 1995A-100000 AT cas3 DOT zlin DOT vutbr DOT cz> <34633686 DOT F5D5C5C8 AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De>
Reply-To: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet3.carleton.ca
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk


Thomas Demmer (demmer AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De) writes:
> No, unless you have a typo here. 60kB x 8 are merely 256kB, something
> that every computer nowadays should have free. FWIW, post what RHIDE
> spits
> out when you create a bug report.

Are you allocating that stuff on the stack in this project? Cause the
stack has exactly that much space ... 256K. Be sure to allocate your 60K
blocks on the heap.
--
    .*.  Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
 -()  <  When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
    `*'  bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh