Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 13:03:14 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka AT ta DOT jcu DOT cz>
To: Martynas Kunigelis <martynas AT nm3 DOT ktu DOT lt>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP and Linux
In-Reply-To: <345F1798.4D14520D@nm3.ktu.lt>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971106130125.16465D-100000@tabor.ta.jcu.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Martynas Kunigelis wrote:

> G. DEL ZZ FROM ADDR Resta wrote:
> 
> > So a lazy question : it will be better (faster) to use djgpp under
> > win95 or gcc under linux, under the above assumptions of
> > no-user-interface ?
> > I just wonder if there is a relevant difference.
> > Does anybody know ?
> 
> Linux Linux and Linux. gcc under Linux is faster than djgpp under DOS.
> And Windows95 is not DOS.
for example my simple program for writing bytes to file in buffered
and unbuffered (byte by byte) way showed that buffered version is
15 times faster than unbuffered and buffered version under DJGPP is
exactly as fast as unbuffered under Linux. BTW buffered version under BC
is slower than buffered under DJGPP, isn't that odd? is BC really so bad
so its advantage of real mode is lost?

Honza
 > > Martynas
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Have you browsed my www pages? Look at:
                       http://www.paru.cas.cz/~hubicka
      Koules-the game for Svgalib,X11 and OS/2,  Xonix-the game for X11
      czech documentation for linux index, original 2D computer art and
              funny 100 years old photos and articles are there!