Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 13:00:51 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Asm Convert
In-Reply-To: <199711060345.TAA03120@adit.ap.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971106130004.4371A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Nate Eldredge wrote:

> >NASM.
> 
> IMHO, when people ask questions they want them answered.  The poster didn't
> ask, "What's a good Intel-syntax assembler for DJGPP?", or even "How can I
> use this Intel-style code?"  He said, "How does this Intel-style code
> translate into AT&T?"  I realize we've been through a discussion of this

IMHO, as long as people post messages that add correct information to
the thread, it is pointless to argue whether that info is or isn't the
answer to the original question.  Doing so just increases the noise in
the signal-to-noise ratio of this group.  It is up to the original
questors to decide which of the replies are relevant for them.