Sender: fabrice AT asim DOT lip6 DOT fr
Message-ID: <3460573B.5601@trash.lip6.fr>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 12:23:39 +0100
From: Fabrice ILPONSE <fabrice AT asim DOT lip6 DOT fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp users group <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: No : Watcom vs DJGPP
References: <345DE302 DOT 3D77 AT trash DOT lip6 DOT fr> <34601984 DOT 48E6 AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Elliott Oti wrote:
> 
> I have no doubt the poster is sincere, but let us, in the name of
> Reason, not start another long utterly pointless thread about which
> compiler is better or faster. Anybody smart enough to use a compiler is
> smart enough IMO to make his own choices. Everybody on this group has
> their own reasons for choosing djgpp. Others prefer to use other
> compilers. That is absolutely fine by me. Let's get back to djgpp
> matters. Thanks.
> 
> --
> ------------ Elliott Oti ---------------
>    ------------- http://www.fys.ruu.nl/~oti  ---------

You're right!

Let's close here the subjet Watcom vs DJGPP!

PS: But sometimes, it's very cool to get different points of view! :))
-- 
	^ ^ ^
	| | |
	+-+-+	Fabrice ILPONSE
	  |	<fabrice AT asim DOT lip6 DOT fr>
	  |
	  |
	  -