From: firewind Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: A DJ Web Browser Date: 28 Sep 1997 05:00:08 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 47 Message-ID: <60ko8o$h3i@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> References: <342D48AB DOT 73F662D1 AT lausd DOT k12 DOT ca DOT us> <60k5cg$qig AT winter DOT news DOT erols DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: elp-tx2-12.ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk kifox wrote: > In article <342D48AB DOT 73F662D1 AT lausd DOT k12 DOT ca DOT us>, csantill AT lausd DOT k12 DOT ca DOT us > says... > > > >from: csantill AT lausd DOT k12 DOT ca DOT us > > > >I meant a DOS graphical browser web browser which dials > >PPP, SLIP, TCP/IP and all that other good serial com > >stuff. I've used used Lynx (the UNIX version thru my > >ISP's BBS) and I want something more powerful. It's > >good when you know the pages that you'll be viewing > >won't have any frames or tables or important graphics > >because its real easy to get when the image is the > >link to the page you want but screen looks like this: > > > >[ LINK ] [ LINK ] [ LINK ] > Actually you can view information in frames using lynx. You'll see > something like FRAME:[ LINK ] on the screen if I remember right. What you see is: FRAME: foo where 'foo' is the 'name' of the frame given in the HTML source, not the URL or any symbol such as [LINK]. [LINK] is seen less and less frequently in Lynx as it has the ability to recognize and create meaningful tags for more and more HTML constructs. Personally, I am hard-pressed to see [LINK] in an average day of browsing with Lynx v2.7.1. Also, Lynx can 'view' graphics and sounds if you have your MIME types setup correctly. After they are, hit * in Lynx and all the [INLINE] things will automagically transform into links you can click on and see the pictures. Granted, this is pretty useless for many of the stupid, insignificant images people throw on their web pages these days, but who really wants to look at those? When you need\want to see a graphic, you can. I only have two complaints about Lynx: tables and Java. Lynx-formatted tables look simply horrendous and there is no support for Java (yet? It would be too cool to see a version of Lynx supporting Java... and have it ported to DJGPP!) -- [- firewind -] [- email: firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org (home), firewind AT aurdev DOT com (work) -] [- "You're just jealous because the voices talk to -me-." -]