From: "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: a few questions...
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 14:59:31 -0500
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 13
Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <34184DA3.2CD9@cornell.edu>
References: <5v87rt$2j4$1 AT kurica DOT wt DOT com DOT au> <0Zxy$AA7IBG0EwOE AT jenkinsdavid DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

David Jenkins wrote:

> I think Win95's DPMI sees the illegal calls and tells the program to
> forget it and carry on. BUT Dos isn't clever enough to do that, so it
> crashes.

it is the other way around. win95 is braindead, and will let most
pointer bugs go undetected. cwsdpmi catches (AFAIK) illegal dereferences
etc. so you know there is something wrong. that is a GOOD thing. if you
think your programs should be able to access all sorts of memory that
they are not supposed to, think again.

  -- Sinan