From: Dominique DOT Biesmans AT nospam DOT ping DOT be (please remove the nospam part) (Dominique Biesmans)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Z-buffering for Allegro (long)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:27:38 GMT
Organization: EUnet Belgium, Leuven, Belgium
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <3416c8d8.1084547@news.eunet.be>
References: <199709100837 DOT SAA23409 AT rabble DOT uow DOT edu DOT au>
Reply-To: Dominique DOT Biesmans AT nospam DOT ping DOT be (please remove the nospam part)
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup030.leuven.eunet.be
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 10 Sep 1997 08:37:16 GMT, *** Brett ***
<bporter AT rabble DOT uow DOT edu DOT au> wrote:

>
>A quick note to the original poster: I almost didn't notice the nospam part
>in your email address. I always just use reply to mail and news, and if you
>have a nospam address, I just get it sent back again. Have you found that
>you have really avoid much spam by using that type of address?
>

Not yet really. But I know now (I wish I had known it earlier) that a
lot of spammers get their e-mail databases by filtering them out of
newsgroups, that's how I'm in a lot of them now.

And to stay a little on-topic : I'm not against a modular approach as
far as Allegro is concerned, I just wonder if it really would save
Shawn some work. I understand his problem though, I have a very
demanding job too.

Dominique Biesmans
(please remove the nospam part of my e-mail address, better ? ;-)