From: firewind <firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Q: argument order in memory copy routine
Date: 9 Sep 1997 02:51:39 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <5v2djr$fda@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
References: <3413F844 DOT 13A4 AT rug DOT ac DOT be> <5v20oe$qc5 AT sjx-ixn10 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <5v28kr$msq$2 AT news DOT sendit DOT nodak DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: elp-tx2-04.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Adam W Lee <adalee AT sendit DOT sendit DOT nodak DOT edu> wrote:

> I don't think he's asking which to use, but rather if he were to write a
> mem copy routine which argument order he should use...  I would agree that
> memcpy's order seems most intuitive, but that may be just because it's the
> first I ever used.

Doh, grrr, reading posts too fast again. :)  I concur, memcpy's format is
probably the best to use.

-- 
[- 				 firewind	                            -]
[-   email: firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org (home), firewind AT aurdev DOT com (work)  -]
[- 	    "You're just jealous because the voices talk to -me-."          -]