From: Weiqi Gao <weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Which is better... EMACS or RHIDE?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 11:33:37 -0500
Organization: Spectrum Healthcare Services
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <33DE1B61.D8DABC92@a.crl.com>
References: <33DD805E DOT DF5783BC AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a116017.stl1.as.crl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Perry Kaye wrote:
> 
> Which is a better editor/development environment for DOS development.
> Can either of these products be used for professional development or should
> I buy a professional editor like multi-edit?

I have both RHIDE and EMACS installed on my machine.  I can't say which
one is better.  However I find myself using EMACS a lot more than RHIDE.

EMACS just grow on you.

--
Weiqi Gao
weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com