From: Erik Max Francis Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Interpreted languages. Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 13:25:45 -0700 Organization: Alcyone Systems Message-ID: <33908949.3C9CF583@alcyone.com> References: <199705311913 DOT OAA18230 AT sendit DOT sendit DOT NoDak DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: newton.alcyone.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 17 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk [I had to go into the DJGPP mailing list archives to actually tell that this was a reply to me. Quoting text is a useful thing.] Adam W Lee wrote: > Well, then, Pentium Pro assembly is an interpreted language. Nonsense. It is compiled into machine code which is then executed by the processor. -- Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / email / max AT alcyone DOT com Alcyone Systems / web / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, California, United States / icbm / 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W \ "Covenants without the sword / are but words." / Camden