From: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT NO DOT SPAM DOT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: CWSDPMI: what all does it do? (was: Commercial Games)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 23:15:49 +0000
Organization: Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <33595225.234E@NO.SPAM.cs.com>
References: <2 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19970416223156 DOT 006aee48 AT gate72> <5j510v$ba3 AT news DOT cei DOT net>
	 <5j8miq$2a34 AT elmo DOT cadvision DOT com> <5jbtdj$lic AT news DOT epcc DOT edu> <uGaEIaAXUeWzEwhz AT jenkinsdavid DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp104.cs.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

David Jenkins wrote:
> 
> >
> >CWSDPMI is *NOT* needed or used under Windows (95). Windows itself
> >provides DPMI, and thus CWSDPMI need not be loaded.
> 
> Is there any way to turn Win95's DPMI off??

Nope.  In fact, doing so would probably cause all sorts of problems for
Win95 applications.

Besides, the only major differences between Win95's DPMI and cwsdpmi are
that cwsdpmi supports a couple of the more useful DPMI 1.0 functions
(NULL pointer protection and memory-mapped devices), and lets you have
more virtual memory than Win95.

In principle, you should never rely on your users having any particular
DPMI host.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I  |     mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com     |
|    *  Proud user of DJGPP!  *    |   http://www.cs.com/fighteer   |
|    ObJoke:  If Bill Gates were a robber, not only would he        |
|     shoot you, but he'd send you a bill for the bullets.          |
---------------------------------------------------------------------