From: Schuster Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Interrupts Maximum Rate Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 08:04:33 -0700 Organization: Lehrstuhl fuer Elektrische Energieversorgung Lines: 31 Message-ID: <334D0181.3D05@eev.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <334A5E67 DOT 2E34 AT eev DOT e-technik DOT uni-erlangen DOT de> NNTP-Posting-Host: eev6.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Peter Berdeklis wrote: > The FAQ suggests that anything more than 10Khz might need a RM handler as > well. However, if you've got a P90 then the extra clock cycles probably > aren't a big deal. I've made a test: Envoking a Hardware-interrupt by a small timing - circuit in the ISA Bus. The Interrupt PM handler just increments a counter, after a minute stops and gives out the calculated frequency = counter/60sec. The frequency of the circuit is variable, and is additionally measured, so the calculated frequency can be prooved. Here the results: P120 - Triton I chipset (Intel): 58 kHz 486 DX50 (AMD): 35 kHZ Additional, if I do 12 imports (0 WS) in the Handler, the result is: P120 - Triton I chipset (Intel): 40 kHz 486 DX50 (AMD): 22 kHZ ... Just in case, somebody wants to know. (Perhaps an update in the FAQ, Eli?) -- ********************************************** Michael Schuster E-mail: Schuster AT eev DOT e-technik DOT uni-erlangen DOT de Lehrstuhl fuer Elektrische Energieversorgung http://www.eev.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de/