Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 11:44:14 -0600 (CST) From: Casey Corcoran To: Eli Zaretskii cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com, Robert DOT Hoehne AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT de, Alessandro Rizzoli Subject: Re: Nmake for WinNT 3.5 utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Eli, Well, after digging through the info files and sources for the past week and a half, I capitulate . . . As nice as developing with MSVC would be, the porting effort seems staggering . . . Meanwhile, I've installed RHIDE, and it seems to work OK. Along those lines, I wonder: Has a project for djgpp been built under RHIDE? Is it available? If not, do you think it is feasible to build one, or should I concentrate my efforts on manually editing the existing make file as we go along? Thanks again for yor help. |...... Casey K. Corcoran ......| University of Illinois |...... ckcorcor AT uiuc DOT edu ......| Center for Supercomputing R & D |....... (217) 244-0049 ........| 1308 W. Main Street, Urbana, IL 61801 On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, Casey Corcoran wrote: > > > I am working on a project to generate native x86 code from java bytecode. > > The approach we are taking is to write a front end for djgpp. It is my > > task, at this point, to become familiar with gcc and set up a development > > environment. To date MSVC has been our platform of choice. However, > > after looking at the sources and the makefile, I don't think it is going > > to be efficient to port the sources. Instead, I think we can write the > > front end on MSVC and wrap a variant of the djgpp makefile into the MSVC > > project. > > I disagree with that assessment. From my experience, it should be > much easier to port your MSVC sources to DJGPP and then use DJGPP > throughout, than to try compiling DJGPP with MSVC (which btw still > doesn't solve your problem of compiling your front > > > > It seems the fastest way to get this accomplished is with the Cygnus GNUPro > > package. I'm sending them an e-mail asking for more information . . . I > > would be interrested in your experiences (if any) with their port of the > > sources. > > I don't have any real experience with the Cygnus port. From what I've > heard, it seems that it is still in beta phase, not something you can > use as a ready production environment. >