From: 71231 DOT 104 AT compuserve DOT com (Richard Slobod) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: groff Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 06:52:43 GMT Organization: Warwick Online Lines: 37 Message-ID: <332ce616.7914472@news.warwick.net> References: <5gb1hl$g09 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> <332944AB DOT 30DC4A0A AT uiuc DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: m255-06.warwick.net To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Steven Engelhardt wrote: > grep is either known as General Regular Expression Parser or known as >the sequence of keys for searching for text in old-school unix ed. >(something like g/re/p i believe. I believe that should be Global Regular Expression Print, since that's what the ed/ex/vi command g/RE/p actually stands for (it also better describes what the grep command actually does, IMHO). >> pico (ditto) > Well pico was based off of pine, the popular mail reader... But other >than that I don't know where the name came frome. Given that pico is the metric prefix for "trillionth", I assume it's meant to indicate that the editor is small. >Remember, however, that you can either set up an alias or a symbolic >link to each filename to call it whatever you want, so if you really >want, you can alias vi to edit. Doing the same thing wasn't possible in >DOS (without copying the entire file) until the invention of DOSKEY (as >far as I know). You could always get the same effect using batch files and there were also third-party programs that provided aliases long before Microsoft started including DOSKEY with DOS. >But if you think about it, the names of the files you work with aren't >really that important in the end, what's more important is the >functionality of the utilities you are given. And I will put up the >functionality of the basic set of unix utilities against the basic set >of DOS utilities any day. Definitely, although luckily there are ports/clones of most of the Unix utilities available for DOS.