Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:55:31 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Moses <waage AT brainerd DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Inter -> AT&T (here we go again)
In-Reply-To: <33290941.14910184@news.polaristel.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970316155441.12150V-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Fri, 14 Mar 1997, Moses wrote:

> I was hoping that I would NOT have to write this but:
> 
> I am having marjor problems getting into the AT&T "groove" for writing
> asm.  When I used TCC all I had to do if I waned to put this into ax
> was:
> 
> mov ax, this
> 
> But I just cant seem to get it to be that simple in AT&T ( or djgpp,
> Im not sure which is making it more difficult ).  What I really want
> to do is 

Did you consider using NASM?  It supports the Intel syntax; see the DJGPP 
FAQ for pointers to where to get NASM.