Message-ID: <c=GB%a=_%p=Indigo_Active_Vi%l=CRIANLARICH-970226160402Z-203@crianlarich.Indigo>
From: Robert Humphris <r DOT humphris AT indigo-avs DOT com>
To: "'djgpp AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>,
        "'Dave Pearson'"
	 <davep AT hagbard DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Subject: RE: SEVERE BUGS in ALLEGRO!
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 16:04:02 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>On 25 Feb 1997 02:29:27 GMT, Paul Derbyshire <pderbysh AT chat DOT carleton DOT ca>
>wrote:
>
>> load_sample("SOUND001") or load_sample("SOUND001.WAV") or
>> load_sample("C:\DJGPP\SOUND001.WAV") and it shoulld CERTAINLY WORK
>> in the latter case, where it was given a FULL FILE PATH to a file
>> that definitely EXISTS and is indeed a WAV file that is mono and not
>> stereo.
>
>Guess again. The later case is the one *MOST* likely to *FAIL*. For
>full details go read a book on C (hint: escapes).

Ooooh dear! perhaps the most cutting of all the responses to Paul
Derbyshire's little tantrum
>
>[SNIP much ranting that doesn't sound so good in light of the above]
Very true, it seems that we once again have more proof (if any was
needed), that Noise and 
Skill are inversely proportional to one and other.

Paul this means that you are LOUD to compensate for your LACK OF
ABILITY, if you have any questions
regarding this, please mail me r DOT humphris AT indigo-avs DOT com or
r DOT humphris AT ukonline DOT co DOT uk.

To everyone else, what's the consensus of opinion on 2.2?

Rob Humphris