From: nelson AT cs DOT uwp DOT edu (Jeremy Nelson) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Quake Editing Utilites Date: 15 Feb 1997 02:20:30 GMT Organization: University of Wisconsin - Parkside Lines: 36 Message-ID: <5e36he$lf7$1@news.inc.net> References: <2 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19970213044916 DOT 0069e530 AT delilah> <5durbn$39b AT flex DOT uunet DOT pipex DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.uwp.edu To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp [someone wrote] >> Why would you want the source? What will/could you do with it? nikki wrote: >learn from it perhaps? I am a huge zealot of free software, and im an bigger zealot that commercial software should come with source code. HOWEVER, If i understand correctly, the quake source was not released by id, but by some renegade third party. Having possession of the source code is at the very least illegal in the same way pirating the binaries is (Its copyrighted, and you didnt have permission to make a copy of it). While source code availability is a huge win and makes everyone's life easier, you should understand the ramificiations of what it entails. More or less put, The Quake source involves several years of intellectual (and proprietary) property of ID. It would be illegal (and probably would get you in a huge legal battle) if you modified the source code and then redistributed binaries created from that source, even if you gave it only to registered owners of quake, even if you did it for free. If i misunderstood everything ive read and seen about this, i apologize profusely for the specifics of my post, but not the content (just replace for quake and for ID...) Id love to see ID just conceed the source code is out there and let everyone who has the *registered version* be able to keep a copy of the sources *for their own personal use only* Jeremy