Message-ID: <6QQ3UUfzccB@jocokko.edition.bonbit.org>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970206174102 DOT 5706K-100000 AT is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: kay AT edition DOT bonbit DOT org (Kay Hayen)
Subject: Re: double-->int: What's wrong here?
Date: 07 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0000
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Distribution: world
Lines: 24
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp


Hallo Leute,

eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)  meinte am 06.02.97
zum Thema "Re: double-->int: What's wrong here?":

>> (BTW I agree with your recommendation in the general case, though, I
>> usually use 0.505 as an error correction value.)
>
>That's for second-graders ;-).  First, people need to be convinced to add
>any value at all.

Is there any source of information, why to recommend 0.505 ? I'm quite  
irrtitated now.

        Mls, Kay



-- =
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>>Shareware nutzen ist gut, sie zu registrieren auch.
>Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus recycelten Elektronen.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>