From: Dave Love <d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: g77 for DJGPP?
Date: 03 Feb 1997 13:54:50 +0000
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <rzqlo96gfkl.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
References: <5cq37c$q1i AT serra DOT unipi DOT it> <5csu6p$5b2 AT host DOT di DOT fct DOT unl DOT pt> <5ct7i7$13lo AT serra DOT unipi DOT it> <5d2ju5$d2d AT top DOT mitre DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: djlvig.dl.ac.uk
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>>>>> "Michael" == Michael F Brenner <mfb AT mbunix DOT mitre DOT org> writes:

 Michael> It seems that g77 is somehow out of synch with the rest of
 Michael> the languages that run under the djgpp DOS extender and the
 Michael> cwsdpmi virtual memory management system

Yes, it needs backend features and bug fixes that aren't in the
released version (and possibly refused by the GCC maintainer).  What
is the problem, exactly?

I was going to try to find time to provide G77 native DJGPP support
(as opposed to cross-building, which should work).  I'm glad someone's
done it already but it would be nice if the changes were sent back to
the maintainer for distribution, especially as the potentially
unix-dependent stuff in the configuration/makefiles is typically
release-dependent (mea culpa, partly).