Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 15:24:40 +0800 (GMT) From: Orlando Andico To: "G.W. Owen" cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: OpenDOS: Win95 emu? Why the hell not!!! In-Reply-To: <5cnnn8$n5g@gerry.cc.keele.ac.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On 29 Jan 1997, G.W. Owen wrote: > : > I know that Caldera WABI is proprietory, but does anyone know how > closely it emulates Win 3.1 > WABI is _guaranteed_ to run Office 4.3, Lotus SmartSuite, and a host of other packages. Maybe that's 100% emulation, I don't know. See the WABI home page at WWW.SUN.COM for a more comprehensive list. WABI is miserably slow on SPARC hardware. On a Sun SPARCstation 10 (40MHz SuperSPARC) which is roughly equal to a P75 in integer performance, WABI runs at about the speed of a 386-20. On Solaris x86 or Linux x86 hardware, WABI is _much_ faster because it's running on the native processor. Check out Caldera's testimonials page (which includes one by Linus, amazingly..) and they claim that the combination of Linux+WABI cannot be distinguised from DOG+Windoze on the same hardware. Only catch is, for Linux+WABI you need 24MB RAM to do anything useful, a far cry from the 4MB with Windoze 3.1. But then, with RAM prices at about $150 for 32MB, it's not so bad. Besides, with tons of RAM in your Linux box, you'll love it when you're _not_ running WABI :) Of course X is much more capable than Windoze, and X alone eats up about 8MB of core. Plus, BASH eats >1MB, XTerm eats 3MB (almost all the X utilities are overkill, thus the amazing size) so 24MB to run Windoze 3.1 under Linux is not so surprising (FWIW, Sun recommends 32MB on SPARC hardware). .-----------------------------------------------------------------. | Orlando Andico email: orly AT gibson DOT eee DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph | | IRC Lab/EE Dept/UP Diliman http://gibson.eee.upd.edu.ph/~orly | | "through adventure we are not adventuresome" -- 10000 Maniacs | `-----------------------------------------------------------------'