From: libolt AT goodnet DOT com (Mike McLean)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP vs Borland C++
Date: 27 Jan 1997 15:48:01 -0700
Organization: Lightning Bolt Software
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <32ee2f98.4110272@news.primenet.com>
References: <5c1qik$9sh AT lion DOT cs DOT latrobe DOT edu DOT au> <32E98087 DOT 6A50 AT cs DOT com> <5ch8gs$qps AT huron DOT eel DOT ufl DOT edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

[SNIP]
>
> Point in hand, Borland C++ targets DOS16, DOS32, WIN3x, WIN95, OS/2,
> and NT while GCC targets DOS32 only. Therefore Borland has a lot more
> code to screw-up, and that doesn't consider the IDE, and other tools it
> comes with. GCC and DJGPP are as buggy as the old Borland DOS based
> systems were. Large software packages are going to have bugs, there
> is no way around it. Borland products are not excesively buggy. They
> got that reputation because they admit they have bugs and release
> patches unlike varoius other vendors. Both products are worth having
> in your arsenal of tools, Borland's for its range of platforms if
> nothing else.

if you consider EMX, and Cygnus GNU-Win32 then GCC targets Dos32,
Win32, and OS/2 on the PC.  Not to mention the other systems GCC runs
on

just my 2 cents :)