Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 09:38:41 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Daisuke Aoyama <jack AT st DOT rim DOT or DOT jp>
cc: DJGPP ML <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: bash, emacs 19.34, termcap
In-Reply-To: <199701172201.HAA07791@mail.st.rim.or.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970119093538.22250G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Daisuke Aoyama wrote:

> (you can see it by env.exe) Some shell script might assume it. 
> I think "TERM=internal" is better than no definition. Does it have any
> problem?

I don't know, but I guess no program other than DOS Emacs uses 
TERM=internal, so if a shell script expects TERM it will be most confused 
when its value is "internal".  I think we should try without TERM at 
all.  If you have example(s) of shell scripts that expects TERM, could 
you see how do they cope with its absence?