From: Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Which is faster? Allegro or Sandmann's LFB
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 19:10:48 -0800
Organization: Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <32C33E38.1F5D@cam.org>
References: <59s2q3$84l AT nuscc DOT nus DOT sg> <19961226 DOT 230751 DOT 4975 DOT 3 DOT chambersb AT juno DOT com>
Reply-To: tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynappp-38.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Benjamin D Chambers wrote:
> >
> I've seen a program get over 200fps with Allegro on a Pentium-133. (Clear
> the buffer, draw on buffer, copy to video).  Was just a test, but it
> worked :)
> 
> ..Chambers
The allegro demo game goes at about 500 fps on my pentium 133,16 mb ram,
800x600 or 640x480 resolution.
Anyway,is it right that the fps values are the same for both 800x600 and
640x480 resolutions?
-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
http://www.cam.org/~tudor

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d-(--) s(-):(+) a? C+ UL>++++ P L>+++++ E- W++ N o K---(----) w---
O---- M-- V-? PS+++ PE Y PGP t+ 5-- X+++>++++ R tv b+ DI D+ G e->++
h>++ r- y>+++++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------