Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 17:43:27 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Alexander Lehmann <lehmann AT mathematik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: v1 versus v2
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.95.961223182641.27286A-100000@fb0408.mathematik.th-darmstadt.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961226173940.7059E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Alexander Lehmann wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > I tested this.  On my machine, I don't see any problems running v2 and v1 
> > programs on Windows in any order.  For the record: I use Windows 3.1.
> 
> Oh, I should have said that I use Win95 when the problem happens. The
> program this happens with is Display for DOS. The program may be due
> to no FPU (I use a 386dx without 387).

It could be the FPU, but a more probable cause is the Display program 
itself.  I don't have it installed, but as far as I remember it does all 
kinds of custom tricks to make graphics work in a v1.x program under DPMI 
(usually, v1.x graphics bombs in DPMI environment).

Anyway, I didn't see any problems on Windows 95 with any v1.x program I 
tried (it was a Pentium machine, since I don't have access to a FPU-less 
system which runs Windows 95).