From: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: gcc compiles so slow?
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 13:24:12 -0800
Organization: Three pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <32B31AFC.6A97@cs.com>
References: <58s98p$460 AT galileo DOT polito DOT it> <19961215 DOT 085724 DOT 7559 DOT 1 DOT chambersb AT juno DOT com>
Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp211.cs.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Benjamin D Chambers wrote:
> 
> Is there a possibility of having gcc support the pipe (ie -pipe) under
> MS-DOS?  Or is this just another inferiority to UNIX that can't be worked
> around?

Well, even if gcc did use pipes, DOS itself uses temporary files to
store the data in a pipe, so there would be zero net gain in speed. 
Perhaps under a multitasking shell like bash, supporting -pipe might be
an option, but until bash becomes both more stable and more universal,
it's not worth the effort.

-- 
John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I <fighteer AT cs DOT com>

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s+:- a-->? c++>$ U@>++$ p>+ L>++ E>++ W++ N++ o+>++ K? w(---)
O- M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP- t+(-) 5- X- R+(++) tv+() b+++ DI++ D++ G>++
e(*)>++++ h!() !r !y+()
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------