From: Stefan Rajec <rajec AT isr DOT uni-stuttgart DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.programming,comp.unix.programmer,comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: quickbasic record to c struct?
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Date: 11 Dec 1996 17:58:22 +0100
Organization: ISR, University of Stuttgart, Germany
Lines: 16
Sender: rajec AT bube
Message-ID: <71via9nhld.fsf@isr.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <58gksj$ign AT butterfly DOT hjs DOT com> <32ACD779 DOT 6923 AT cs DOT com>
	<1996Dec11 DOT 094130 DOT 2322 AT nntp DOT muohio DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bube.isr.uni-stuttgart.de
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.84)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

randy AT avian DOT dars DOT muohio DOT edu (Randy Kaelber) writes:

Randy Kaelber:
> John M. Aldrich (fighteer AT cs DOT com) wrote:
> 
> > Finally, as another poster mentioned, BASIC arrays go from 1..n, while C
> > arrays go from 0..(n-1).  Thus, the size arguments to the string
> 
> Are we sure of this? It's been years since I've done any BASIC 
> programming, but I'm quite certain that array indexes started at 0.

It's been years since I've done any Basic programming, but I remember
that there was something like "OPTION BASE 0" in my dialect of Basic,
which sets the arrays to begin at index 0.

	bobo