From: "John M. Aldrich" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Another newbie question: Watcom or DJGPP??? Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 18:54:43 -0800 Organization: Three pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt Lines: 28 Message-ID: <32AE2272.5DFC@cs.com> References: <32AA42A7 DOT 19BB AT flash DOT net> <32AAB7C1 DOT 2B6A AT cs DOT com> <32ACD033 DOT B03 AT cam DOT org> <32AD008B DOT 4E99 AT cs DOT com> <01bbe69b$1e00aa20$010200c0 AT weiqigao> Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp105.cs.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Weiqi Gao DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Weiqi Gao wrote: > > Just for arguments sake, you can't buy the DJGPP compiler either. No, you can get the DJGPP compiler for free. The last time I looked, zero is the smallest price there is. ;) Take a look at the licensing documents of DJGPP when you next have a chance. I could download the source for each and every DJGPP tool and utility and change it to my heart's content. I could even redistribute it if I wanted, save that under the GPL I would be obligated to distribute the source code as well, I would have to give full credit to DJ Delorie and the other developers for any work of theirs that I used, and I couldn't call it "DJGPP". But this is a nonsense argument, because the difference between Watcom and DJGPP is that you don't need to buy _anything_ to improve DJGPP - just get the source and submit the patches when you're done. I foresee that, because of this, someday DJGPP will have _everything_ that Watcom currently boasts of, and more... and better. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I | fighteer AT cs DOT com | | "Starting flamewars since 1993" | http://www.cs.com/fighteer | | *** NOTICE *** This .signature is generated randomly. | | If you don't like it, sue my computer. | ---------------------------------------------------------------------