From: "A. Kunigelis" <algikun AT santaka DOT sc-uni DOT ktu DOT lt>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Idea for powerful IDE
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 14:10:58 +0000
Organization: LITNET
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.95.961202140812.26360F-100000@santaka.sc-uni.ktu.lt>
References: <32A0FD87 DOT 66AA AT nlc DOT net DOT au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: santaka.sc-uni.ktu.lt
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <32A0FD87.66AA@nlc.net.au>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp



> 
> 	Considering people are thinking of porting RHIDE to Win95/97..
> 

Is that really true??? How come people keep talking about what crapp
Windows is and then still put effort in it??? Why isn't porting RHIDE to
Linux a primary project? Linux definitely needs a good IDE for gcc,
because the old WPE is.. old? And there's a version of TurboVision for
Linux, too!

Martynas