From: "Mike McLean" <libolt AT primenet DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: compiling emacs 19.34
Date: 26 Nov 1996 20:56:02 -0700
Organization: MikeWare SoftWorks
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <01bbdc16$e66090a0$1d16a5ce@pentium-133>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961125071752 DOT 844G-100000 AT is> <329A55B1 DOT 7D32 AT cs DOT com> <57ev0c$dld AT nexp DOT crl DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Windows 95 is not a bad operating system, I don't see any relationship to
the mac OS, And I have had to live with the harshness of Dos, then I got
windows 3.11, Windows 95 is a good OS, don't put it down for being what it
is, and I DON'T think the Macintosh or Linux or unix suck either.

Weiqi Gao <weiqigao AT crl DOT com> wrote in article <57ev0c$dld AT nexp DOT crl DOT com>...
> "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com> wrote:
> 
> >In my experience, Windows 95 tends to make users dumber, not smarter. 
> >Or maybe it just attracts dumber users...  I say this only partly
> >tongue-in-cheek.  :/
> 
> There used to be a formula that states "user friendliness is directly
> proportional to programmer hostilility."  Can we translate that into
> "user dumbness is directly proportional to programmer cleverness"?  Or
> should it be "user dumbness is directly proportional to programmer
> dumbness"?
> 
> --
> Weiqi Gao
> weiqigao AT crl DOT com
> 
>