To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: ld2.4 vs ld2.5.2
Message-ID: <19961114.200112.8423.0.aclemmer@juno.com>
From: aclemmer AT juno DOT com (Aaron M Clemmer)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 20:01:37 EST

	According to Scitech Software, there was a bug in ld2.5.2 that
would cause it to have errors when linking one of their object files.  So
they said to use ld2.4, since that would properly link this file.  So I
would like to know if it is a bad idea to use an older version of the
linker with djgpp v2.0, and if there is a new version of the linker with
the bug fixed.