From: "Chris A. Triebel" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Future of Allegro Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:52:28 -0500 Organization: University of New Hampshire - Durham, NH Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <328B20BF DOT 20EE AT eik DOT bme DOT hu> NNTP-Posting-Host: sun4.iol.unh.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE In-Reply-To: <328B20BF.20EE@eik.bme.hu> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp On Thu, 14 Nov 1996, Dr. Andr=E1s S=F3lyom wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 NOV 1996 14:38:07 +0100=20 > From: Dr. Andr=E1s S=F3lyom > Newgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Subject: Re: Future of Allegro=20 >=20 > Rubicant wrote: > > 2) More importantly, Allegro is basically stuck where it is. Mind you= , > > it's got ALOT of functionality and great features as it is, but for it = to > > remain as is is a shame.=20 >=20 > Although I have downloaded Allegro, I have had no time yet to use it. So > my question is certainly a very stupid one for the rest of you, but > would you specify more exactly what features are missing from it ? It > can have bugs of course, and missing drivers for some of the sound and > video cards out there, but what else? >=20 > =09=09=09=09=09=09=09Andras More of a variety of widgets, maybe even an enhancement to the way they=20 are handled. I had to do one work around myself to do a pop up because=20 the background of the pop up wrote over the buttons in the dialog, I still= =20 don't know why similar dialogs work in Shawn's code and not mine. There=20 may have been a better way to do it, but I couldn't think of one so I=20 rewrote the box_proc to redraw the whole dialog every time it got focus. (Also, even though Shawn doesn't think so, I would like to see these widget= s=20 mated to classes in C++, not a major desire, but one none-the-less ). I am sure everyone else has their own ideas. cat