Message-ID: <32746B87.441C@gbrmpa.gov.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 16:15:05 +0800
From: Leath Muller <leathm AT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au>
Reply-To: leathm AT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au
Organization: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Alaric B. Williams" <alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP V2.01 Released
References: <846263987 DOT 18931 DOT 0 AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I don't want to end up with a superfat everything included version,
> simply because many people just want things like the section
> attribute fixed. I certainly won't put in the Pentium patch, since I
> don't have a pentium, and I wouldn't be happy about putting something
> on the page I can't fully test!
> 
> > Development would be much easier and the final program would benefit a
> > lot
> > from this option. A stable program with fast (and may be complicated)
> > algorithms will beat any optimizer, IMHO.
> 
> Well, if everyone wants it in there, I'll put it in.
> 
> At the moment, I'm only planning on applying the attribute
> ((section)) patch.

I'd love a pentium optimization patch for DJGPP... :)

Leathal.