Message-ID: <199609031145.VAA00764@iccu6.ipswich.gil.com.au> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Peter Smith" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 21:47:44 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: djgpp/allegro - help! - quick question Um, at xe risk of being xrown off xis list for posting irelevant long postings, I am advokaiting that the ingliy speeking wurld adopt xe folowing caings to speling: (this is off semios-l) > With thanks to Tom Collins: > > Alan C. Harris, Ph. D. TELNOS: main off: 818-677-2853 > INTERNET email: ALAN DOT HARRIS AT CSUN DOT EDU > WWW homepage: http://www.csun.edu/~vcspc005 > =============================================================== > > From: Tom Collins > > spelling reform???????? > > In a letter to THE ECONOMIST, M. J. Shields of Jarrow, England, points > out that George Bernard Shaw, among others, urged spelling reform, > suggesting that one letter be altered or deleted each year, thus > giving the populace time to absorb the change. Shields writes: > > For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be > replaced by either "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be > part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained > would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 1 > might well reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take > the same konsonant, wile Year 3 night well abolish "y", replasing it > with "i", and Iear 4 might fiks the "g-j" anomali wonse and for all. > > Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear, with > Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or > so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. > Bai Ier 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi possibl tu meik ius ov thi > ridandant letez "c", "y", and "x"--bai now jast a memori in the maindz > ov ould doderez--tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispectivli. > > Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a > lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld. > Haweve, sins xe Wely, xe Airiy, and xe Skots du not spik Ingliy, sei > wud hev to hev a speling siutd tu xer oun lengwij. Xei kud, haweve, > orlwiz lern Ingliy az a sekond lengwij at skuul! -- Iorz feixfuli, > M. J. Yilz. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Smith psmith AT gil DOT com DOT au o _ / `--' \ You are here------->* _ _/ \| -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------