Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 11:00:54 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "Garrido Freire, Francisco Javier" <Francisco-Javier DOT Garrido AT cs DOT us DOT es>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Was: Re: Multitasking in DOS
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.93.960809131454.11912B-100000@nervion.cs.us.es>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960811105747.24678N@is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Fri, 9 Aug 1996, Garrido Freire, Fco. Javier ((R)JA.GAR. SOFT) wrote:

> RIGHT! That's what I *exactly* meant. If a debugger can run a
> child, Why couldn't it run several ones? This support could be
> in, say, go32.exe, (sorry DJ, more code in go32!!).

I was talking about DJGPP v2, where there's no go32.exe.

> flat memory model and PM for her children. You shouldn't need change
> anything on it. If it's given a good interface for fork(), pipe(),
> wait() getpid(), ... multitasking doesn't (shouldn't) depend on

I'm afraid porting a Unix shell to MSDOS means more than just supporting 
fork/exec and pipe.