Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6829
From: student AT fiutek DOT chem DOT uw DOT edu DOT pl (student chemii)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: BC3.1 Classlib -> DJGPP ???
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 08:23:32 GMT
Organization: University of Warsaw, Department of Chemistry
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <student.95.839233412@fiutek.chem.uw.edu.pl>
References: <DvLsFt DOT 8A0 AT discus DOT technion DOT ac DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: andrew.chem.uw.edu.pl
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <DvLsFt DOT 8A0 AT discus DOT technion DOT ac DOT il> abarak AT techunix DOT technion DOT ac DOT il (Barak Amit) writes:
>From: abarak AT techunix DOT technion DOT ac DOT il (Barak Amit)
>Subject: BC3.1 Classlib -> DJGPP ???
>Date: Sun, 4 Aug 1996 07:50:17 GMT
>I have a piece of software I developed under BC3.1 that uses BC
>Class Libraries extensively, and works fine except it tends to run
>out of memory when dealing with large databases.
>
>(This is definitly not a memory leakage problem, it's just that DOS
>conventional memory is too small for some of the databases)
>
>I was thinking maybe porting it to DJGPP could be a solution ,
>does anyone have any experience doing such thing? (especially the
>class libraries part. I have the classlib sources that came with
>the BC3.1 compiler)
>
>Thanks,
>
>               Amit Barak.
>
It sounds interesting. How do you think what the main problems with porting
Borland Class Libraries might come from ?
I have some experience with Borland porting Turbo Vision 2.0 to DJGPP
(to be finished maybe this week !)

Wojtek Galazka