Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6873
From: wgalazka AT zoolook DOT chem DOT uw DOT edu DOT pl (Wojciech Galazka)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Intel asm rather than AT&T asm under djgpp?
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 08:33:54 GMT
Organization: University of Warsaw, Department of Chemistry
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <wgalazka.106.839320434@zoolook.chem.uw.edu.pl>
References: <Dvnswo DOT F9z AT serval DOT net DOT wsu DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: andrew.chem.uw.edu.pl
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <Dvnswo DOT F9z AT serval DOT net DOT wsu DOT edu> hixson AT mail DOT wsu DOT edu (M@) writes:
>From: hixson AT mail DOT wsu DOT edu (M@)
>Subject: Intel asm rather than AT&T asm under djgpp?
>Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 10:02:52 GMT
>Hello,
>   I am interested in using djgpp to do some C/ASM programming.
>However, I was wondering if it is at all possible to use Intel's asm
>programming syntax rather than AT&T's.  All of the examples I've seen
>

There is a converter from Intel asm to At&T asm. See djgpp FAQ
Wojciech Galazka
Computer Center
Wydzial Chemii UW
Pasteura 1
02-093 Warszawa
Poland