From: kagel AT quasar DOT bloomberg DOT com
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 10:47:54 -0400
Message-Id: <9608051447.AA01496@quasar.bloomberg.com >
To: Giva AT bbb DOT no
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com, gv AT nera DOT no, Giva AT bbb DOT no
In-Reply-To: <9608031903.AA06307@bbb.no> (message from Gisle Vanem on 3 Aug 96 19:02:54 +0100)
Subject: Re: Compile Errors
Reply-To: kagel AT dg1 DOT bloomberg DOT com

   Errors-To: postmaster AT ns1
   Date:  3 Aug 96 19:02:54 +0100
   From: Gisle Vanem <Giva AT bbb DOT no>
   Cc: gv AT nera DOT no, Giva AT bbb DOT no
   X-Mailer: BBB/Mail
   Content-Type: text
   Content-Length: 388

   Art S. Kagel <kagel AT quasar DOT bloomberg DOT com> said:

   >> Almost, actually there is a third valid definition for main():
   >>
   >>        int main( int argc, char **argv, char **environment )

   Shouldn't that be:

	     int main( int argc, char **argv, int envc, char **environment)
					       ^^^
   This is how HighC and MSVC defines it.

   Gisle V.

No!  I got it right!  From ANSI, GCC, and every UNIX "C" that I have run across
that was recent enough to have bothered to implement it, the correct format is:


       int main( int argc, char **argv, char **environment )

(BTW: High C is explicitly MSC source compliant sooo ... )
-- 
Art S. Kagel, kagel AT quasar DOT bloomberg DOT com

A proverb is no proverb to you 'till life has illustrated it.  -- John Keats