Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6601 From: lehmann AT mathematik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de (Alexander Lehmann) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: MSDOS Unzip Program Date: 29 Jul 1996 17:19:12 GMT Organization: Technische Hochschule Darmstadt Lines: 37 Message-ID: <4tirqg$139h@rs18.hrz.th-darmstadt.de> References: <199607271835 DOT LAA16441 AT netcom23 DOT netcom DOT com> <31F98C68 DOT 59E8 AT ix DOT netcom DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fb0408.mathematik.th-darmstadt.de To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp iNFiK wrote: : > : > I ported the unzip and zip programs to djgpp. They are more reliable : > than pkzip which is whi I did the port. : > : how can your unzip program be more reliable htan PKware's unzip program? : Pk*zip is the REAL and 1st zip program that eveyone uses (well .. dos : users anyway). But you may be right if you're talking about : error-freeness, but not compatability with other .ZIPs. : =) Actually, my experiences with freeware was in most cases that they were better than the commercial `orginals' they immitate (GNU cc is certainly one example for that). As for free zip/unzip: If you ever have tried to unzip a zip that contained unix names including more than one dot or text files in unix or Mac EOL convention, you might know what I think of PKZIP/PKUNZIP (plus the silly -d option). Also, unzip is much more flexible with minor format errors. And unzip is much better tested than pkunzip, since anyone can search for bugs. There were decompression errors both in unzip and in pkunzip, but the shareware pkunzip hasn't fixed them yet, AFAIK (unless there is a newer version than 2.04g available that I have missed). bye, Alexander Oh, yes, and it is available everywhere, pkware doesn't have a unix zip AFAIK. -- Alexander Lehmann, | "On the Internet, alex AT hal DOT rhein-main DOT de (plain, MIME, NeXT) | nobody knows lehmann AT mathematik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de (plain) | you're a dog." !!CHANGED!!